The Supreme Court criticized Tamil Nadu Sports Minister and DMK leader Udhayanidhi Stalin for ‘abusing his rights’ and making comments on ‘Sanatana Dharma’. The court emphasized that as a minister, he should refrain from such remarks. Stalin has sought the consolidation of multiple FIRs against him in different states, represented by senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi. The bench disapproved of his actions and highlighted that he should be aware of the repercussions of his statements.
You are not an ordinary person: The statement made by the Supreme Court regarding Stalin’s Sanatan Dharma remark.
The bench inquired, “Are you not aware of the repercussions of your actions when you misuse your rights to freedom of speech and expression, as well as freedom of religion, and then seek protection from the Supreme Court under Article 32?” In defense of Stalin, Singhvi referred to previous cases involving Arnab Goswami, Nupur Sharma, Mohd Zubair, and Amish Devgan, where the apex court had consolidated FIRs and requested a similar approach for the DMK leader.
Singhvi expressed his concerns, stating, “If I have to approach six different high courts, I will constantly be entangled in this… This is a form of persecution even before the prosecution begins.”
In response, the bench remarked, “You are not an ordinary individual, but a minister. You should be aware of the consequences.”
Subsequently, the bench scheduled the hearing for March 15.
DMK leader Stalin had made remarks comparing ‘Sanatana Dharma’ to diseases such as ‘malaria’ and ‘dengue,’ advocating for its eradication due to its association with the caste system and historical discrimination. Udhayanidhi Stalin, the son of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK leader MK Stalin, is a member of the ruling party.